The domestic soft routing user base is large, and soft routing systems are widely welcomed for their high flexibility and rich functionality. The following analyzes several mainstream soft routing system firmware, including OpenWrt, iKuaiOS, ImmortalWrt, iStoreOS, and X-Wrt, comparing their advantages and disadvantages in terms of functionality, ease of use, hardware compatibility, and community support, and providing selection suggestions for different user needs.
Soft routing system firmware download: https://ruanluyou.net/go
OpenWrt: The open-source benchmark, flexible but requires hands-on skills#
OpenWrt is the "big brother" in the soft routing field, known for its open-source nature and high customization. It supports a vast range of hardware, covering almost everything from low-end entry devices to high-end x86 architectures. It has rich features and a large plugin ecosystem, covering needs such as network management and traffic monitoring. The community is active, with frequent tutorials and firmware updates, making it suitable for users who enjoy tinkering.
The downside is that the entry barrier is relatively high. The default interface is rudimentary, and configuration requires a certain level of Linux knowledge, especially when manually installing plugins or optimizing performance, which may deter beginners. Although hardware compatibility is broad, some new devices require users to compile firmware themselves, increasing usage costs.
Recommended audience: Users with a certain technical foundation, pursuing extreme customization, and willing to spend time researching configurations.
iKuaiOS: Commercial experience, simple and efficient#
iKuaiOS is optimized for domestic users, with an intuitive interface and high integration of functions. It focuses on enterprise-level routing features, such as bandwidth management and behavior auditing, and can easily handle home scenarios. Installation is simple, supporting common x86 hardware and some brand routers, ready to use out of the box. The official technical support and firmware updates are relatively stable, suitable for users pursuing efficiency.
The drawback is that the free version has limited features, and advanced functions require paid unlocking. The plugin ecosystem is relatively weak, and its extensibility is not as good as open-source systems. The range of hardware compatibility is limited, and some low-end or older devices may not be able to run it.
Recommended audience: Home or small business users who want quick deployment, a user-friendly interface, and do not want to tinker too much.
ImmortalWrt: Performance optimization, a new favorite for enthusiasts#
ImmortalWrt is a branch of OpenWrt, focusing on performance optimization and adaptation to domestic network environments. Compared to the original OpenWrt, it performs better in wireless drivers and kernel optimization, suitable for users with high demands for network speed and stability. The supported hardware range is similar to OpenWrt, and the community is quite active, with frequent exchanges among domestic users. You can join the soft routing communication Q group for support.
The downside is that documentation and tutorials are relatively scarce, and beginners may face a learning curve. The firmware update frequency for some hardware is not as high as OpenWrt, so users need to pay attention to community dynamics for the latest support.
Recommended audience: Players familiar with the basics of OpenWrt, pursuing performance optimization, and focusing on the domestic network environment.
iStoreOS: Simple and lightweight, beginner-friendly#
iStoreOS focuses on lightweight and ease of use, with a modern interface and operation logic similar to commercial routers. It supports x86 and some ARM architecture devices, suitable for small soft routing devices or low-power scenarios. It has a built-in app store, allowing plugin installation without complex configuration, with low system resource usage and smooth operation.
The downside is that the depth of features is limited, and advanced users may find it not flexible enough. The community is smaller, and users may need to explore more on their own when encountering problems. The range of hardware compatibility is also not as extensive as OpenWrt.
Recommended audience: Soft routing beginners or home users needing low power and simple management.
X-Wrt: Balancing ease of use and customization#
X-Wrt optimizes the interface and functionality based on OpenWrt, balancing ease of use and flexibility. Compared to the original OpenWrt, configuration is more intuitive, with commonly used plugins built-in to reduce manual installation steps. It has broad hardware support, and the community provides many pre-compiled firmware options, suitable for users who do not want to start configuration from scratch.
The downside is that some features are not as integrated as iKuaiOS, and the aesthetic of the interface is slightly inferior. Community support is mainly from domestic users, with fewer English documents, which may not be suitable for international users.
Recommended audience: Intermediate users looking for a balance between the flexibility of OpenWrt and ease of use.
Summary and selection suggestions#
The five soft routing systems above each have their characteristics, suitable for different user needs. OpenWrt and ImmortalWrt are suitable for tech enthusiasts, with the former having a complete ecosystem and the latter excelling in performance, but both require a certain level of hands-on skills. iKuaiOS and iStoreOS are more suitable for users pursuing simplicity and efficiency, with the former leaning towards enterprise-level and the latter being lightweight and easy to use. X-Wrt strikes a balance between flexibility and ease of use, suitable for intermediate players.
When choosing, consider hardware, budget, and technical level comprehensively. If the budget is limited or the hardware is older, OpenWrt and ImmortalWrt are the first choices; for those seeking plug-and-play, iKuaiOS or iStoreOS is more suitable; for those wanting to balance tinkering and convenience, X-Wrt is a good compromise. Regardless of which one you choose, joining the soft routing communication Q group can provide more practical experience and support, making your soft routing journey smoother.